Loading revision…
Loading revision…
Syllabus: Continuous-time Signals: Fourier series and Fourier transform, sampling theorem and applications.
10 hand-picked visual resources on this topic, 5 of them little-known gems — under each card, look for See it. Every link is checked against the live site before it ships.
Transform pairs worth memorising
Most questions are a standard pair plus one property. Deriving from the integral is almost always the slow route.
See it
Properties that do the work
Differentiation, scaling and modulation turn a known pair into the one you need.
builds odd signals from even ones
Symmetry shortcuts
A real even signal has a real even transform; a real odd signal has a purely imaginary odd transform. This alone eliminates half the options in many questions.
Fourier series: the two forms
Any periodic signal meeting the Dirichlet conditions is a sum of harmonics of its fundamental. The exponential form is the one to work in — the coefficients are a single integral, and the trigonometric coefficients drop out of it.
Symmetry kills half the coefficients
Spotting the symmetry of a waveform before integrating is worth more than any integration trick — it tells you which coefficients are zero without computing them.
Fourier transform of a periodic signal
A periodic signal has a line spectrum: its Fourier transform is a train of impulses at the harmonics, weighted by the Fourier-series coefficients. This is how the two tools meet, and it is what makes sampling analysis work.
Correlation and energy spectral density
Correlation measures how much one signal resembles a shifted copy of another; autocorrelation is the special case that peaks at zero lag. For energy signals it transforms to the energy spectral density, the same way autocorrelation of a random process transforms to its PSD.
a Gaussian stays Gaussian
compress in time, stretch in frequency
modulation
Parseval
See it
exponential form
trigonometric form
converting between the two
so is even and odd
Parseval for periodic signals
Where marks are lost
is the average value, not twice it — but some books define as the DC term. Check which convention the question's formula sheet uses before trusting a memorised answer.
See it
a square wave and a triangular wave both have this
it never touches any harmonic
See it
an impulse train transforms to an impulse train
the two limiting cases
correlation is convolution with one signal time-reversed
energy spectral density
the peak is the signal's energy
nothing resembles a signal better than itself
Where marks are lost
Correlation is not convolution: there is no folding of the first signal. Mixing them up flips the answer's time axis, which matters the moment the signals are asymmetric.